Corporate Governance and Cooperative Societies : A Study of Cooperative Societies in Odisha.

Corporate Governance and Cooperative Societies : A Study of Cooperative Societies in Odisha.

AUTHORS :

S. N. Tripathy

 

DOI :

CP2020/OCT-MAR/ARTCL1

 

ABSTRACT :

The present paper with the help of secondary sources of data attempts to capture the major events that shaped the course of cooperative movements in Odisha. The paper portrays the prevailing socio-economic factors and key events which contributed to the development of cooperatives in different phases and its genesis and growth trend in Odisha in the national perspectives.

 
REFERENCES :
  1. Bengal under the Lieutenant-Governors, Vol. I. In C. Buckland – Northcok, S. (n.d.).
  2. Madras Provincial Banking Enquiry Committee Report, 5 Vols. Madras. – Government of Madras. (1930).
  3. Contractual Labour in Agricultural Sector. Discovery Publishing. – Tripathy, S. (2000).
  4. Co-operative Movement in Odisha: Highlights of Progress. Odisha Review, February – March, 51-54. – Senapati, S. (2012).
  5. Annual Activity Report 2018-19. Cooperation Department. –   Government of Odisha.
 
KEYWORDS :

Cooperatives Movements, Rural credit, Money lenders, Farmers.

AUTHORS :

C.Vijaya, C. Lakshmi

 
DOI :

CP2021/October-December2021/ARTCL4

 
ABSTRACT :

The cooperative movement, in recent times, appears to have started addressing the issue of corporate governance. Sequel to this development, some resources to promote good governance can reasonably be expected within the movement itself. This paper therefore was set out to examine whether lack of transparency is a feature of most cooperative societies, to ascertain whether the executives of cooperative societies show good commitment towards accountability and to assess the significance of members’ participation in the democratic process giving room for the emergence of incompetent individuals on the executive and board of cooperatives in Odisha. It was also meant to evaluate the need for cooperative societies to engage in sound internal control and risk management and to investigate whether weak corporate governance is solely responsible for the maladministration of cooperative societies in the State. The source of data was primary and the five hypotheses formulated were tested using descriptive statistics and analysis of variance. Essentially, the study found that the executives of cooperative societies are not committed to transparency and accountability. The principal recommendations of the study are that the executives should demonstrate high level commitment towards the sustainability of cooperative societies and that these societies should embrace the principles of good corporate governance that is capable of fostering total accountability, adequate transparency, sound internal control and full disclosure of their activities.

 
REFERENCES :
    1. Alo, O (2008). Ethics and corporate governance: Issues in technology driven economy. The .Director, July Edition: 7
    2. Adenikinju, O. (2005). Managerial characteristics, corporate governance and corporate performance: The case of Odishan quoted companies. Being Draft Final Report submitted to the AERC, November, 2005.
    3. Bhasin, M (2009). Corporate governance and transparency scenario: An empirical Study of Asia. International Review of Business Research Papers, 5(6), 269-297.
    4. Bhasin, M. & Manama, A (2009). Corporate governance disclosure practices in India : An empirical study www.docjac.com/documemt/ view.shtml?id…title.
    5. Bond, J. K. (2009). Cooperative financial performance and board of director characteristics: A quantitative investigation. Journal of Cooperatives, 22, 22-44.
    6. Brasilia (2008).Corporate Governance. Guidelines for Good Practices of Financial Cooperative Governance. Banco . Central Do Brasil. http://www.bcb.gov.br/?PUBLICATIONSALPHA
    7. Chaves, R. &Sajardo-Moreno (2004). Social Economy Managers : Between Values and Retrenchment. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 76(1), 139-161.
    8. Claessens, S. (2003).Corporate governance and development. Global Corporate Governance Forum Focus 1 Washington: World Bank.
    9. Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117.
    10. Cuevas, C & Fischer, K. (2006).Cooperative Financial Institutions: Issues in Governance, Regulation and Supervision, World Bank Working Paper No 82.
    11. Discussion Paper  (2004). Corporate Governance in India: Theory and Practice. National Foundation for Corporate Governance, September, 2004.
    12. Sulaiman  A.  (2003).  Corporate governance  and  organizational  performance. In  O.Alo  (Ed)  Issues  inCorporate Governance(pp 131–148)  Lagos, Financial Institutions Training Centre.
    13. Sundaram, A. K. and Inkpen, A. C. (2004). The Corporate Objective Revisited” OrganizationScience, 15(3), 350-363.
    14. US Congress, Senate Report (2003). “The Role of the Board of Directors in Enron’s Collapse”. Washington DC:Senate Report 107-70, 107th Congress 2nd Session, July, p3.
 
KEYWORDS :

Cooperative Societies, Corporate Governance, Accountability, Sustainability, Internal Control, Transparency and Disclosure